Hersey
Hersey v. Westlake Financial Services
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 JEFFERY HERSEY, Case No. 25-cv-07282-VKD
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
10 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
11 WESTLAKE FINANCIAL SERVICES, et al., 12 Defendants.
13 14 On September 4, 2025, the Court issued an order denying without prejudice Mr. Hersey’s 15 application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), noting discrepancies and/or inconsistencies in 16 the application. Dkt. No. 4. Mr. Hersey was given until September 26, 2025 to file a renewed IFP 17 application. Id. at 1. Alternatively, Mr. Hersey had the option of paying the filing fee by 18 September 26, 2025. Id. at 1-2. The September 4, 2025 order expressly stated that “the Court 19 may recommend dismissal this action if Mr. Hersey does not file a renewed application or pay the 20 filing fee by the September 26, 2025 deadline.” Id. at 2. The September 26, 2025 has passed. 21 There is no indication on the docket that Mr. Hersey has filed a renewed IFP application…