Bell v. Oama Coronado LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MICHAEL BELL AND LISA PHILLIPS, Case No.: 3:25-cv-02227-RBM-MMP
10 Plaintiffs,
ORDER:
11 v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO 12 OAMA CORONADO LLC, et al.,
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
13 Defendants. [Doc. 3]
14 (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT ON 15 SCREENING PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) [Doc. 1] 16
17 (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX
PARTE APPLICATION FOR
18
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
19 ORDER [Doc. 2]
20
21 This action allegedly concerns an unlawful detainer matter adjudicated in the 22 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego (“San Diego Superior Court”), 23 captioned Oama Coronado LLC v. Bell, Case No. 25UD010130C (the “Unlawful Detainer 24 Action”). (See Doc. 1-2 at 2, 8.)1 On August 27, 2025, Plaintiffs Michael Bell and Lisa 25 26
27 1 The Court cites the paragraph numbers of the Complaint and the CM/ECF electronic 28 1 Phillips (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)…