Louangmilith

Louangmilith v. Noem

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20253:25-cv-02502California2,864 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SIRIPHONE LOUANGMILITH, Case No.: 25-cv-2502-JES-MSB

12 Petitioner,

ORDER:

13 v. (1) DENYING IN PART AND 14 KRISTI NOEM; PAMELA JO BONDI;

GRANTING IN PART PETITION

TODD M. LYONS; JESUS ROCHA; and 15 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; CHRISTOPHER LaROSE, and 16 Respondents. 17 (2) DENYING MOTION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

18

ORDER AS MOOT

19 [ECF Nos. 1, 3] 20

21 22 Before the Court is Petitioner Siriphone Louangmilith’s Petition for Writ of Habeas 23 Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1), and accompanying Motion for 24 Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). The parties submitted briefing on these matters, 25 and the Court held a hearing on October 1, 2025. ECF Nos. 1, 2, 4, 9. For the reasons set 26 forth below and at the hearing, the Court DENIES IN PART and GRANTS IN PART the 27 writ of habeas corpus, and DENIES AS MOOT the motion for TRO. 28 // 1 I. BACKGROUND 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.