Rittenhouse

Rittenhouse v. BlendJet, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20252:23-cv-01906California2,204 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 GREGORY RITTENHOUSE and LINDA No. 2:23-cv-1906 WBS DB GAGE, individually and on behalf 13 of all others similarly situated, 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT RYAN PAMPLIN’S 15 MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD v. AMENDED COMPLAINT 16

BLENDJET INC., RYAN PAMPLIN,

17 MAVORCO HOLDINGS LLC, MAVORCO IP, LLC, and MAVORCO OPERATIONS, 18 LLC, 19 Defendants. 20 21 ----oo0oo---- 22 Plaintiffs Gregory Rittenhouse and Linda Gage brought 23 this putative class action against defendants BlendJet Inc., Ryan 24 Pamplin, Mavorco IP, LLC, and Mavorco Operations, LLC, alleging 25 several violations of law in connection with purportedly 26 defective blenders. (See Third Am. Compl. (“TAC”) (Docket No. 27 77) ¶¶ 153-222.) Defendant Ryan Pamplin, chief executive officer 28 1 and co-founder of BlendJet, moves to dismiss the following 2 against him in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.