Schweiger

Schweiger v. Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20253:25-cv-02768California824 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 OFIR SCHWEIGER, Case No. 25-cv-02768-JSC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

9 v. FOR LEAVE TO NAME AN

ADDITIONAL PLAINTIFF AND FOR

10 ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC., et al., THE COURT TO APPOINT HIS

COUNSEL

Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. No. 46, 57

12

13 Plaintiff Ofir Schweiger instituted this putative class action against Ultra Clean Holdings 14 and two individuals (“Defendants”) for making materially false and misleading statements and 15 omissions to artificially inflate the price of its stock in violation of the Securities Exchange Act, 16 (“PSLRA”), and related regulations. (Dkt. No. 1.)1 Notice of the action was made on March 24, 17 2025 and filed with the Court on April 11, 2025. (Dkt. Nos. 9, 9-1.) Subsequently, four putative 18 class members (collectively “movants”) moved for appointment as lead plaintiff and for approval 19 of their respective selections of lead counsel, including Anthony Marchitto represented by Levi & 20 Korsinsky, LLP. (Dkt. No. 23.) After opening briefs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.