Becerra

Pacific Surgical Institute of Pain Management, Inc. v. Becerra

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20253:24-cv-01725California2,793 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PACIFIC SURGICAL INSTITUTE OF Case No. 24-cv-01725-BAS-DTF

PAIN MANAGEMENT, INC.,

12 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S 13 v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED

14 ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., PETITION (ECF No. 18) 15 Respondent.

16 17 Presently before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended 18 Verified Petition (ECF No. 18). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES 19 Petitioner’s Motion to File Amended Petition. The Court hereby DIRECTS the Clerk of 20 the Court to close the case. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 Pacific Surgical Institute of Pain Management, Inc., (“Petitioner”) is a California 23 corporation operating an ambulatory surgical center located in San Diego, California, 24 specializing in the treatment of chronic pain. (ECF No. 1 ¶ 1.) From September 17, 2013, 25 through March 8, 2016, Pacific Surgical provided Medicare-covered services to 26 beneficiaries. Pacific Surgical was initially granted Medicare…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.