Pearson

Pearson v. Mondelez Global LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20252:25-cv-01270California2,480 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 JEREMIAH PEARSON, individually No. 2:25-cv-01270 WBS SCR and on behalf of all others 13 similarly situated, 14 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

DEFENDANT MONDELEZ GLOBAL

15 v. LLC’S MOTION TO STAY OR

TRANSFER VENUE

16 MONDELEZ GLOBAL LLC, 17 Defendant. 18 19 ----oo0oo---- 20 Plaintiff Jeremiah Pearson brought this putative class 21 action against defendant Mondelez Global LLC, claiming consumer 22 protection and contract law violations in connection with an 23 allegedly deceptive label on defendant’s product. (See Compl. 24 (Docket No. 1) ¶¶ 1-5.) Defendant now moves to stay under the 25 first-to-file rule on the grounds that plaintiff’s action mirrors 26 another consolidated class action currently pending in the 27 Northern District of Illinois. (See Docket No. 9 at 1-2.) 28 1 Defendant requests in the alternative to transfer venue pursuant 2 to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). (See id.) 3 I.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.