Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. BELFOR USA Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20255:22-cv-02071California9,177 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 RICHARD RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 22-cv-02071-VKD

9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

10 v. AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’

FEES, COSTS, AND A CLASS

11 BELFOR USA GROUP, INC., et al., REPRESENTATIVE ENHANCEMENT

PAYMENT

Defendants. 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 82, 83

13

14 Plaintiff Richard Rodriguez asserts claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 15 § 201, et seq. (“FLSA”), the California Private Attorneys’ General Act, California Labor Code 16 § 2698, et seq. (“PAGA”), and other California state labor laws on behalf of himself and others 17 similarly situated against his former employers, defendants Belfor USA Group, Inc., Belfor 18 Environmental, Inc., Oakwood Construction and Restoration Services, Inc., and 1 800 Water 19 Damage North America, LLC (collectively “defendants”). See Dkt. No. 27. On May 21, 2025, 20 the Court granted plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of a class, collective, and 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.