(PS) Anthony v. County of Solano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SUSAN BRASHEAR ANTHONHY, No. 2:25-cv-02248-TLN-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al.

15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel, brings this motion for temporary restraining order 18 (ECF No. 4) that is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s motion is appropriate for decision without oral argument within the 20 meaning of Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff’s motion should be 21 denied and this action dismissed. 22 I. Procedural Background 23 On August 8, 2025, plaintiff Susan Anthony commenced this action by filing a complaint 24 and paying the filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) The named defendants consist of three counties, five 25 magistrate judges, a sheriff’s deputy, and two county attorneys. (Id., ¶¶ 17-22.) Broadly 26 speaking, plaintiff claims defendants engaged in a years-long “campaign of…