Soryadvongsa
Soryadvongsa v. Noem
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 Bounpheng SORYADVONGSA, Case No.: 25-cv-2663-AGS-DDL
4 Petitioner,
ORDER SCREENING HABEAS
5 v. PETITION (ECF 1), GRANTING
MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL
6 Kristi NOEM, et al., (ECF 2), DENYING TEMPORARY 7 Respondents. RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF 3),
AND SETTING HEARING
8
9 Petitioner Bounpheng Soryadvongsa seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 10 § 2241 challenging his immigration detention. (See ECF 1.) He also requests counsel 11 appointment and a temporary restraining order. (See ECF 2; ECF 3.) 12 SCREENING 13 The Court first must screen the habeas petition and dismiss it “if it plainly appears 14 from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief.” See 15 Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, Rule 4; id., 16 Rule 1(b) (permitting use of Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases to any “habeas corpus 17 petition”). To survive screening, the petitioner …