Olga Kirpicheva v. Bosh Enterprises, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20252:25-cv-08651California419 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OLGA KIRPICHEVA, Case No. 2:25-cv-08651-SB-AJR

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

SUBJECT-MATTER

BOSH ENTERPRISES, LLC et al., JURISDICTION

Defendants.

Plaintiff Olga Kirpicheva filed the complaint in state court on August 1, 2025. Defendants filed a notice of removal on September 11, 2025. Dkt. No. 1.

Federal courts have subject-matter jurisdiction only over matters authorized by the Constitution and Congress. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). This Court has a duty to assess whether federal subject-matter jurisdiction exists and may consider the issue sua sponte at any stage of the proceedings. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hughes, 358 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir. 2004); see also Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 U.S. 574, 583 (1999) (recognizing that “Article III generally requires a federal court to satisfy itself of its jurisdiction over the subject matter before it considers the merits of a case”).

A federal district court has original jurisdiction over a civil action when (1) a federal question is presented in an action “arising under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.