Castaneda
Castaneda v. The City and County of San Francisco, California
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 BENJAMIN JOB CASTANEDA, Case No. 25-cv-05048-LB
12 Plaintiff,
13 v. ORDER REASSIGNING CASE;
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
14 THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN TO DISMISS FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Re: ECF No. 12 Defendants. 16 17 The plaintiff, who appears to be representing himself fraudulently by impersonating an 18 attorney (Mr. Bryan Castaneda) and has not paid the filing fee, sued the City and County of San 19 Francisco, the State of California, and Building Owners Management Association, alleging 20 harassment in violation of state and federal law.1 Because of the apparent fraud by the plaintiff, 21 the court issued an order (attached) to show cause why the case should not be closed for failure to 22 pay the filing fee or prosecute the case. The court allowed the plaintiff until September 11, 2025, 23 to respond.2 He did not. The case should be dismissed. 24 Because not all parties…