LeGrand
LeGrand v. Abbott Laboratories
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CONDALISA LEGRAND, Case No. 22-cv-05815-TSH
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE
9 v. RENEWED MOTION FOR CLASS
CERTIFICATION
10 ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Re: Dkt. No. 192 11 Defendant.
12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Condalisa LeGrand’s Motion for Leave to File 15 Renewed Motion for Class Certification. ECF No. 192. Defendant Abbott Laboratories has filed 16 an Opposition (ECF No. 199) and Plaintiff has filed a Reply (200). The Court finds this matter 17 suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the October 30, 2025 hearing. See 18 Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. 19 II. BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiff brings this putative class action against Abbott, alleging certain statements on the 21 labels of Abbott’s Ensure® nutrition drinks are false and misleading. Second Am. Compl., ECF 22 No. 116. On June 9,…