Lucero

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHARLES PATRICK LUCERO, Case No. 24-cv-07510-JSC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL; OF

9 v. SERVICE

10 CARLOS ARCE, et al., Defendants. 11

12 13 Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding without an attorney, filed this civil rights case 14 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After reviewing the 11-page complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the 15 Court concluded, when liberally construed, it stated claims capable of judicial determination and 16 review against Defendant Dr. Mendez. (ECF No. 12.) All of the other claims were dismissed 17 because they were not capable of judicial determination. (Id.) Plaintiff received leave to amend 18 those claims, with the exception of the claims against the California Department of Corrections 19 and Rehabilitation, which were dismissed without leave to amend. (Id.) The Court cautioned 20 Plaintiff that if he failed to amend the complaint by the deadline of June 18, 2025, the claims that 21 are dismissed will not be part of this case, and…