Aznaur Grigoryan v. Jeff Macomber

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 AZNAUR GRIGORYAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-04143-MRA-JC

13 STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. 14 15 JEFF MACOMBER, [DOCKET NO. 16] 16 Respondent. 17 18 The Court has conducted the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636, including a 19 || de novo review of those portions of the June 5, 2025, Report and Recommendation 20 || of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report’’) as to which Petitioner has objected 21 || (“Objections”). The Report recommends, in pertinent part, the dismissal of Ground 22 || Four of the Petition without leave to amend. (ECF No. 33.) Petitioner objects only 23 || to the dismissal of Ground Four, in which he claims that his due process rights were 24 || violated when the Los Angeles County Superior Court denied his petition for 25 || resentencing. (ECF No. 40 at 5.) Petitioner argues that this claim is cognizable as 26 || a federal habeas claim because “an arbitrary deprivation of a state law liberty interest 27 || in the…