Sonichsen

Sonichsen v. Ascentium Capital CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 13, 2025G063221California1,900 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sanchez, J.

FACTS

I.

THE LEASE AGREEMENT, GUARANTY, AND ASSIGNMENT

In 2014, Yellow Dog Holdings, LLC (Yellow Dog) entered into an equipment lease agreement with Alliance Funding Group (Alliance), a non- party to this appeal, whereby Yellow Dog leased a paint booth. Appellants personally guaranteed Yellow Dog’s obligations under the lease by signing a “Lease Guaranty” provision contained within the lease. The guaranty included the following attorney fees provision, which is central to the instant appeal: “I will reimburse all expenses [Alliance] incur[s] in enforcing [its] rights against [Yellow Dog] or me, including, without limitation, attorney’s fees and costs.” Early in the lease term, Alliance assigned its rights under the lease to Ascentium. Among other things, the assignment authorized

1 Respondent Regions Bank is the successor to Ascentium. For clarity and consistency with the appellate briefing, we refer to the entity throughout this opinion as “Ascentium.”

2 Ascentium to “take all legal or other proceedings which [Alliance] could have taken with respect to the Assigned Contract and related documents, including, without limitation the enforcement of rights and remedies under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.