Thomas Robert Dilks v. Jason Anderson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20255:24-cv-02686California1,244 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS ROBERT DILKS, Case No. 5:24-cv-02686-JFW-PD

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 13 v. FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

14 JASON ANDERSON, et al., 15 16 Defendants.

17 18 I. Pertinent Procedural History and Plaintiff’s Claims 19 On December 16, 2024, Thomas Robert Dilks (“Plaintiff”), a pretrial 20 detainee proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 21 §§ 1983 and 1985 and 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962-1964, alleging violations of various 22 rights under the United States Constitution, along with federal and state 23 criminal statutes, in connection with his pending criminal charges. Dkt. No. 24 1. The Complaint named 28 Defendants and asserted 11 causes of action, 25 including claims for civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act 26 (“RICO”), intentional violation of common law torts, fraud, intentional 27 obstruction of justice, intentional and negligent interference with prospective 28 economic advantage, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.