Samuel Elliot v. Carolyn Colvin

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20252:24-cv-05059California4,046 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 SAMUEL E., ) Case No. 2:24-cv-05059-SP ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ) ORDER 14 FRANK BISIGNANO, ) Commissioner of Social Security ) 15 Administration, ) ) 16 Defendant. ) ) 17 )

18 19 I. 20 INTRODUCTION 21 On June 14, 2024, plaintiff Samuel E. filed a complaint against defendant, the 22 Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), seeking a review 23 of a denial of a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and 24 supplemental security income (“SSI”). The parties have fully briefed the issues in 25 dispute, and the court deems the matter suitable for adjudication without oral argument. 26 Plaintiff presents two disputed issues for decision: (1) whether the administrative 27 law judge (“ALJ”) properly evaluated plaintiff’s subjective symptom testimony regarding 28 his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.