Nathan C. Silva v. Evan Spiegel

JS6

1

2

3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 5 NATHAN C. SILVA, No. 2:25-cv-08477-RGK-RAO 6 derivatively on behalf of SNAP INC., [PROPOSED] ORDER OF 7 Plaintiffs, VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 8 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.

9 EVAN SPIEGEL, DEREK 41(A)(1)(A)(ii) AND 23.1(C) 10 ANDERSEN, ROBERT MURPHY,

MICHAEL LYNTON, KELLY [11]

11 COFFEY, JOANNA COLES, LIZ 12 JENKINS, JIM LANZONE, SCOTT

D. MILLER, PATRICK SPENCE,

13 POPPY THORPE, and FIDEL 14 VARGAS, Defendants, 15 and 16

SNAP INC.

17 Nominal Defendant. 18 19 WHEREAS, on September 8, 2025 Plaintiff Nathan C. Silva (“Plaintiff”) filed 20 a shareholder derivative action in this Court purportedly on behalf of Nominal 21 Defendant Snap Inc. (“Snap” or the “Company”) against Evan Spiegel, Derek 22 Andersen, Robert Murphy, Michael Lynton, Kelly Coffey, Joanna Coles, Liz Jenkins, 23 Jim Lanzone, Scott D. Miller, Patrick Spence, Poppy Thorpe, and Fidel Vargas, 24 (collectively, the “Defendants”) (collectively with Plaintiff and Snap, the “Parties”); 25 …