Joseph Kelly v. Evan Spiegel

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20252:25-cv-08654California581 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

JS6

1

2

3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 5 JOSEPH KELLY, No. 2:25-cv-08654-RGK-KS 6 derivatively on behalf of SNAP INC., [PROPOSED] ORDER OF 7 Plaintiffs, VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 8 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.

9 EVAN SPIEGEL, DEREK 41(A)(1)(A)(ii) AND 23.1(C) 10 ANDERSEN, ROBERT MURPHY,

MICHAEL LYNTON, KELLY [13]

11 COFFEY, JOANNA COLES, LIZ Assigned to: Judge R. Gary Klausner 12 JENKINS, JIM LANZONE, SCOTT

D. MILLER, PATRICK SPENCE,

13 POPPY THORPE, and FIDEL 14 VARGAS, Defendants, 15 and 16

SNAP INC.

17 Nominal Defendant. 18 19 WHEREAS, on September 12, 2025 Plaintiff Joseph Kelly (“Plaintiff”) filed a 20 shareholder derivative action in this Court purportedly on behalf of Nominal 21 Defendant Snap Inc. (“Snap” or the “Company”) against Evan Spiegel, Derek 22 Andersen, Robert Murphy, Michael Lynton, Kelly Coffey, Joanna Coles, Liz Jenkins, 23 Jim Lanzone, Scott D. Miller, Patrick Spence, Poppy Thorpe, and Fidel Vargas, 24 (collectively, the “Defendants”) (collectively with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.