Miriam Maldonado v. Ghardash Enterprises, Inc., et al

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20252:25-cv-08783California419 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-08783-RGK-MAA Date September 30, 2025 Title MIRIAM MALDONADO v. GHARDASH ENTERPRISES, INC., et al Present: The Honorable GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Joseph Remigio (not present) Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS — ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010-12213, and a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53, and other state claims. It appears that the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, and other state law claim that plaintiff has alleged, pursuant to the Court’s supplemental jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). The supplemental jurisdiction statute “reflects the understanding that, when deciding whether to exercise supplemental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.