Erna Dwirapita v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 202517-72215California673 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERNA DWIRAPITA, No. 17-72215

Petitioner, Agency No. A099-357-555

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 7, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: NGUYEN and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

Erna Dwirapita, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen

her claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States Senior District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. Against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.