Bondi

Gonzalez Gonzalez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 202523-1162California653 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FELIPE GONZALEZ-GONZALEZ, No. 23-1162 Agency No. Petitioner, A074-797-181 v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 17, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: COLLINS, MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Felipe Gonzalez-Gonzalez (“petitioner”), a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming

the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for cancellation of removal.

Petitioner argues that his removal would cause “exceptional and extremely unusual”

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). hardship to his stepson because it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.