Diaz

Diaz v. Cunha

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 202524-5355California280 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ENRIQUE ZACARIAS DIAZ, No. 24-5355 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01125-YY Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

J. CUNHA; V. ALVARADO; D.

MCGREGOR; J. CIMMIYOTI; J.

BATEMAN; T. NESS; A. GONZALEZ;

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Adrienne C. Nelson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 19, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, HURWITZ, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Oregon state prisoner Enrique Zacarias Diaz appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his 42

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising from his time in

disciplinary segregation. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.