Vicky Flores Lemus De Zacarias v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 202520-72874California682 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICKY GISELA FLORES LEMUS DE No. 20-72874 ZACARIAS; ESTUARDO EFRAIN Agency Nos.

ZACARIAS FLORES, A208-919-958 & A208-919-959

Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

PAMELA J. BONDI, United States Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 8, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, MILLER, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Vicky Gisela Flores Lemus de Zacarias (Lemus de Zacarias) and Estuardo

Efrain Zacarias Flores, natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing their appeal of a

decision from an Immigration Judge denying their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.