Bondi

Salcido Coronel v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 202524-1961California975 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 14 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISAIAS SALCIDO CORONEL, No. 24-1961

Petitioner, Agency No.

A200-824-400

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 9, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, NGUYEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Isaias Salcido Coronel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his motion to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). reopen and reconsider. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and

procedural history of the case, we need not recount it here.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a

motion to reopen or reconsider, as well as the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.