Medina-Araiza

Medina-Araiza v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 202525-1338California315 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERMAN MEDINA-ARAIZA, No. 25-1338 Agency No. Petitioner, A076-693-432 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 19, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, HURWITZ, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

German Medina-Araiza, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for

cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for substantial evidence whether the agency erred in applying the exceptional and

extremely unusual hardship…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.