Gonzalez-Granados

Gonzalez-Granados v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 202524-2721California386 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOE GONZALEZ-GRANADOS, No. 24-2721 Agency No. Petitioner, A215-881-585 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 9, 2025** Las Vegas, Nevada

Before: BENNETT, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Noe Gonzalez-Granados is a native and citizen of Mexico. He petitions for

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his

appeal of an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) (collectively, “the agency”)

denying his application for cancellation of removal. Where, as here, the BIA agrees

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). with the IJ’s reasoning and supplements that reasoning with its own analysis,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.