Rodriguez-Aparicio
Rodriguez-Aparicio v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 202524-3085California866 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 14 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SILVIA JULIANA RODRIGUEZ- No. 24-3085 APARICIO; J.E. RODRIGUEZ- Agency Nos.
APARICIO, A240-247-454
A240-493-901
Petitioners,
v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 9, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, NGUYEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Silvia Juliana Rodriguez-Aparicio and her minor son, J.E., natives and
citizens of Colombia, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
decision dismissing their appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order denying their
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). applications for asylum,…