Rodriguez-Aparicio

Rodriguez-Aparicio v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 202524-3085California866 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SILVIA JULIANA RODRIGUEZ- No. 24-3085 APARICIO; J.E. RODRIGUEZ- Agency Nos.

APARICIO, A240-247-454

A240-493-901

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 9, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, NGUYEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Silvia Juliana Rodriguez-Aparicio and her minor son, J.E., natives and

citizens of Colombia, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

decision dismissing their appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order denying their

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). applications for asylum,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.