In re R.L.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 14, 2025B341295California5,106 words

Opinion

Opinion

Viramontes, J.

INTRODUCTION

Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) appeals from the dismissal of its petition for minor R.L. under Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section 300, subdivisions (a) and (b). DCFS alleged that R.L. came within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court because the then-10-month-old child was injured in a motor vehicle accident where the father was driving, the child was seated in the mother’s lap rather than secured in a car seat, and both parents were under the influence of alcohol. The juvenile court dismissed the petition, finding that DCFS failed to meet its burden of proving R.L. was at a current risk of harm based on this isolated incident of parental neglect. We conclude the juvenile court did not err in dismissing the petition because the evidence did not compel a finding in favor of jurisdiction as a matter of law. We accordingly affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. Dependency petition Kimberly G. (Mother) and Omar L. (Father) are the parents of R.L., a boy born in July 2023. In May 2024, DCFS received a referral alleging that the family was involved in a motor vehicle accident in which Father was driving above the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.