Beck

Beck v. Catanzarite Law Corporation CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 14, 2025G064410California4,493 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/14/25 Beck v. Catanzarite Law Corporation CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

JUSTIN S. BECK,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G064410

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2020- 01145998)

CATANZARITE LAW

CORPORATION et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Randall J. Sherman, Judge. Affirmed. Motion to dismiss denied. Requests for judicial notice granted in part and denied in part. Motion to augment denied. Motion for sanctions denied. Justin S. Beck, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Catanzarite Law Corporation, Kenneth J. Catanzarite and Brandon E. Woodward for Defendants and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.