Slater

Diane Slater v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20253:23-cv-03703California3,286 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DIANE SLATER, Case No. 23-cv-03703-JD

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

9 v. AND VACATING TRIAL

10 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE

CORPORATION,

11 Defendant.

12 13 Plaintiff Diane Slater worked as a bank manager for defendant First Republic National 14 Bank until 2018. She sued the bank on several California state employment claims. The case has 15 traveled a winding road from state court to arbitration and now here. The Federal Deposit 16 Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was appointed as Receiver for the bank in 2023, and removed the 17 arbitration to the Court pursuant to the removal provisions in 12 U.S.C. § 1819(b)(2)(A). Dkt. 18 No. 1. The FDIC also separately removed the original California state case on the same grounds, 19 which the Court related to this one and subsequently closed as duplicative. See Dkt. No. 11 20 (relating Case No. 23-cv-03747); Dkt. No. 97 (closing case). Slater’s lawyer withdrew from 21 representing her over disagreements about case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.