Franklin-Chomas

Margaret Franklin-Chomas, an individual, on behalf of herself and all other individuals v. Internet Referral Services, LLC; Red Dog Media, Inc.; Ticket Fulfillment Services, L.P.; and Vivid Seats Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20253:24-cv-02320California5,611 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No.: 3:24-cv-02320-L-DDL MARGARET FRANKLIN-CHOMAS, an 12 individual, on behalf of herself and all ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 other individuals, DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION;

14 Plaintiff,

DENYING MOTION TO STAY; AND

15 v. DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

16 INTERNET REFERRAL SERVICES, LLC; RED DOG MEDIA, INC.; [ECF No. 26.] 17

TICKET FULFILLMENT SERVICES,

18 L.P.; and VIVID SEATS INC., 19 Defendants. 20 Pending before the Court is Defendants Internet Referral Services, LLC (“IRS”); 21 Red Dog Media, Inc. (“Red Dog”); Ticket Fulfillment Services, L.P. (“TFS”); and Vivid 22 Seats Inc.’s (“Vivid Seats,” collectively “Defendants”), motion to compel arbitration and 23 dismiss or stay litigation, or alternatively, dismiss. (ECF No. 26.) Plaintiff Margaret 24 Franklin-Chomas (“Plaintiff”) opposed (ECF No. 34), and Defendants replied (ECF No. 25 37). Each party initially lodged their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.