Onofre

Alberto Blanco Onofre, et al. v. Ford Motor Company, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20253:25-cv-00485California1,079 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No.: 25cv485-TWR (MSB) ALBERTO BLANCO ONOFRE, et al.,

12 Plaintiffs,

ORDER:

13 v. (1) GRANTING IN PART JOINT MOTION [ECF NO. 19]; 14 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendants. (2) ISSUING AMENDED SCHEDULING

ORDER

16 17 18 On October 9, 2025, Plaintiffs Alberto Blanco Onofre and Luis Blanco (“Plaintiffs”) 19 and Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”) filed a 20 Joint Stipulation to Amend the Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 19.) Pursuant to Civil Local 21 Rule 7.2, the Court construes this as a Joint Motion. (See CivLR 7.2.) During a 22 Telephonic Case Management Conference on October 6, 2025, the Parties informed the 23 Court they planned to file a joint request seeking an extension of all discovery dates. 24 (ECF No. 18.) The undersigned told the Parties this would be fine, provided they did not 25 request to move any pre-trial dates in front of the Honorable District Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.