Kennard
Carolyn Kennard, an individual, on behalf of herself, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated v. Cherry Hill Programs, Inc., a Corporation; DOES 1 through
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No.: 3:25cv652-BTM-VET CAROLYN KENNARD, an 12 individual, on behalf of herself, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 13 and on behalf of all persons AND DENYING IN PART similarly situated, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 14
DISMISS AND GRANTING IN
15 Plaintiff, PART AND DENYING IN PART v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 16
LEAVE TO AMEND
CHERRY HILL PROGRAMS, INC.,
17 a Corporation; DOES 1 through [ECF NOS. 19 & 26] 18 50, inclusive,
19 Defendants. 20
21 Pending before the Court is Defendant Cherry Hill Programs, Inc.’s motion 22 to dismiss Plaintiff Carolyn Kennard’s second amended complaint (SAC). (ECF 23 No. 19). For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted in part and denied 24 in part. Also pending before the Court is Plaintiff Carolyn Kennard’s motion for 25 leave to amend. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted in part 26 and denied in part. (ECF No. 26). 27 28 1 BACKGROUND 2 The SAC asserts…