Picart

Stephen Mark Picart v. Marcus Pollard; Alejandro R. Gonzalez; Shade Williams

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20253:25-cv-01846California4,431 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEPHEN MARK PICART, Case No.: 25-cv-1846-AJB-AHG

CDCR #G-67811,

12

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO 14

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

15 MARCUS POLLARD, Warden; (2) DISMISSING DEFENDANT 16 ALEJANDRO R. GONZALEZ, Program

POLLARD PURSUANT TO

Sergeant; SHADE WILLIAMS, Program 17 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) Sergeant; RASHAD RAINEY, AND 1915A(b)(1) 18 Correctional Officer,

19 Defendants. AND

20 (3) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL 21 TO EFFECT SERVICE UPON

REMAINING DEFENDANTS

22 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) 23 AND Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3)

24 (Doc. No. 2) 25 26 Plaintiff Stephen Mark Picart, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at 27 Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, has filed a 28 civil rights Complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. No. 1), together with 1 a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.