(SS)Lee

Naima Tosha Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20251:25-cv-01007California765 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

2 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 6 Naima Tosha Lee, CASE NUMBER: 1:25-cv-01007-GSA 7 Plaintiff, 8 FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY 9 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN Commissioner of Social Security, FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO 10 REQUIRE FILING FEE PAYMENT,

AND DIRECTING CLERK TO

11 Defendant. RANDOMLY ASSIGN A UNITED

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12 (Doc. 2) 13

14

15

16

17 Plaintiff moves to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Docs. 1–2. 18 I. Legal Standard 19 In order to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, Plaintiff must submit an affidavit 20 demonstrating that he “is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 21 1915(a)(1). “To proceed in forma pauperis is a privilege not a right.” Smart v. Heinze, 347 F.2d 22 114, 116 (9th Cir. 1965). In enacting the in forma pauperis statute, “Congress intended to 23 guarantee that no citizen shall be denied an opportunity to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.