Vargas-Nino

Vargas-Nino v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 202524-2160California873 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 15 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CRISTIAN CAMILO VARGAS-NINO; No. 24-2160 LINA YISSEL BARON-SAAVEDRA; Agency Nos.

NIKOLAS VARGAS-BARON; DANA A241-700-048

SOFIA VARGAS-BARON, A241-700-049

A241-700-050

Petitioners,

A241-700-051

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 10, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, NGUYEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Cristian Camilo Vargas-Nino, his wife, and his minor children, natives and

citizens of Colombia (collectively, Vargas-Nino), petition for review of a Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing their appeal of an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.