People v. Hartman CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant Robert Henry Hartman was convicted of two counts of
committing a lewd and lascivious act upon a person fourteen years of age (Pen. Code,1
§ 288, subd. (c)(1)) as the result of two incidents in which he touched M.D., a friend of
his girlfriend’s daughter. He was sentenced to a term of two years in state prison.
On appeal, defendant argues the judgment should be reversed because: (1) the
trial court erred by excluding evidence related to M.D.’s mental health treatment at the
time of the alleged offenses; (2) the trial court erred by excluding evidence of M.D.’s
interview with police; and (3) the trial court erred by denying a motion to dismiss or
motion for new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. We disagree with each of
these contentions and affirm the judgment.
II. BACKGROUND
In July 2018, M.D. reported she was inappropriately touched by defendant while
visiting a friend’s home for a sleepover. As a result of M.D.’s allegations, defendant was
charged with two counts of committing a lewd and lascivious act upon a person fourteen
years of age (§ 288, subd. (c)(1)).