People v. Maki CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 15, 2025B339358California2,133 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baltodano, J.

Filed 10/15/25 P. v. Maki CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B339358 (Super. Ct. No. BA517535) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County)

v.

SHERIDAN MAKI,

Defendant and Appellant.

Here we hold that a person invoking the Fourth Amendment who does not have permission to maintain a structure that illegally obstructs a public pedestrian sidewalk does not have an objectively reasonable expectation of privacy. Thus, law enforcement is not required to obtain a warrant to search the structure. Sheridan Maki appeals from the judgment after a jury convicted him of sale of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379, subd. (a)). The trial court placed Maki on formal probation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.