Marin
Mel Marin v. John Bahr, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MEL MARIN, Case No.: 23-cv-336-RSH-BLM
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
13 v. RULE 59 AND RULE 60 MOTIONS
14 JOHN BAHR, et al., [ECF Nos. 94, 95] 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Before the Court are motions filed by plaintiff Mel Marin pursuant to Rules 59 and 19 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF Nos. 94, 95. As set forth below, the 20 Court denies the motions. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 A. Plaintiff’s Allegations 23 The instant action arises from unlawful detainer proceedings brought against 24 Plaintiff in California Superior Court. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) 25 alleges as follows. 26 In 2007, Plaintiff’s sister obtained a home equity loan secured by a condominium 27 located at 2410 Albatross Street, San Diego, California (the “Albatross Property”). ECF 28 No. 78 ¶ 15. According to Plaintiff, the loan was never funded, but the lender, World 1 Savings (later…