Young
Karen Young v. Meta Platforms, Inc., et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KAREN YOUNG, Case No. 24-cv-03583-HSG
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS
9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 35 10 META PLATFORMS, INC., et al., 11 Defendants.
12 On March 10, 2025, the Court dismissed Pro Se Plaintiff Karen Young’s original 13 complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 31. Plaintiff timely filed an amended complaint 14 (“FAC”), Dkt. No. 32, and Defendants again move to dismiss. Dkt. No. 35 (“Mot.”). The motion 15 is fully briefed. See Dkt. Nos. 37 (“Opp.”) and 38 (“Reply”). The Court again finds this matter 16 appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil 17 L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS the motion, this time without 18 leave to amend. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 All of Plaintiff’s claims in the FAC, as in the original complaint, arise from an incident in 21 which her Facebook page was hacked. Plaintiff states that she created and operates a Facebook 22 page titled…