Anthony Robinson, Jr. v. CarMax Auto Finance, LLC, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY ROBINSON, JR., Case No. 2:24-cv-2795-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO
13 v. PROSECUTE 14 CARMAX AUTO FINANCE, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Anthony Robinson, Jr., proceeding without the aid of counsel, filed this 18 action on October 11, 2024.1 (ECF No. 1.) On May 8, 2025, the Court issued Findings 19 and Recommendations recommending Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis 20 (“IFP”) be denied and the Complaint be dismissed with leave to amend. 5/8/2025 21 Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 3). On June 16, 2025, the district judge 22 adopted the May 8, 2025 Findings and Recommendations in full and denied Plaintiff’s 23 IFP and dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint. 6/16/2025 Order (ECF No. 4). The June 16, 24 2025 Order also granted Plaintiff thirty (30) days to file an amended complaint and 25 directed Plaintiff to pay the filing fee at the time of filing the amended complaint. Id. at 2.…