Valtierra-Lule

Oyuky Maricela Valtierra-Lule v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20255:25-cv-08790California429 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 OYUKY MARICELA VALTIERRA-LULE, Case No. 25-cv-08790-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 12 WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE v. REMANDED TO STATE 13 COURT FOR LACK OF

TARGET CORPORATION, SUBJECT MATTER

14 JURISDICTION Defendant. 15 Re: ECF 1 16 17 Defendant Target Corporation removed this case brought by Plaintiff Oyuky 18 Maricela Valtierra-Lule to this Court from Santa Clara County Superior Court on October 19 14, 2025. ECF 1. This Order requires Target to “show cause” by filing a written response 20 by October 29, 2025, explaining why this case should not be remanded back to state court 21 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 22 Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. 23 Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). District courts have subject matter jurisdiction 24 through…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.