In re: Natasha Mora v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division, and Christopher M. Klein, United States Bankruptcy Judge, Black Horse Capital, Fine Capital Investments, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 In re: NATASHA MORA, No. 2:25-cv-2299-TLN-SCR 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY
COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
15 OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
DIVISION,
16 Respondent, 17 and 18 CHRISTOPHER M. KLEIN, United States 19 Bankruptcy Judge, BLACK HORSE
CAPITAL, FINE CAPITAL
20 INVESTMENTS, et al.,
21 Real Party in Interest
22 23 On August 29, 2025, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations to deny the 24 Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Request for Emergency Relief (“Mandamus Petition”) (ECF 25 No. 1), and a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO Motion”) (ECF No. 3). ECF No. 26 5 at 20-21. Petitioner has since filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 27 6), a Renewed Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“Renewed TRO Motion”) (ECF Nos. 28 1 7, 10),1 and a First Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus (“FAP”) (ECF No. 8). The 2 undersigned now recommends that the FAP be…