Ramos
Ramos v. Singleton
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 202525-1435California309 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 16 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JONATHON ANGEL RAMOS, No. 25-1435 D.C. No. 8:25-cv-00254-SPG-SSC Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ELIZABETH SINGLETON; GLENN
COLEMAN; TANYA DEGRATE; CITY
OF SAN DIEGO; SAN DIEGO POLICE
DEPARTMENT; UNITED STATES
DRUG ENFORCEMENT
ADMINISTRATION; UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Sherilyn Peace Garnett, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 15, 2025**
Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Jonathan Angel Ramos appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims. We have…