Ramos

Ramos v. Singleton

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 202525-1435California309 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JONATHON ANGEL RAMOS, No. 25-1435 D.C. No. 8:25-cv-00254-SPG-SSC Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ELIZABETH SINGLETON; GLENN

COLEMAN; TANYA DEGRATE; CITY

OF SAN DIEGO; SAN DIEGO POLICE

DEPARTMENT; UNITED STATES

DRUG ENFORCEMENT

ADMINISTRATION; UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY; FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Sherilyn Peace Garnett, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2025**

Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Jonathan Angel Ramos appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.