Navarro

Navarro v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 202524-5458California522 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELSA VILLA NAVARRO, No. 24-5458 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-06623-JFW-JC v. MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 8, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, GOULD, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Elsa Villa Navarro (“Navarro”) seeks review of the district court’s

order and judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“Commissioner”) denial of Navarro’s application for disability benefits. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. As the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.