Alfred

Alfred v. City of Vallejo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 202525-1658California789 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 15 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EVELYN DAVIS ALFRED, No. 25-1658 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:24-cv-03317-DC-SCR v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF VALLEJO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dena M. Coggins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 10, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, NGUYEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

The City of Vallejo (“City”) appeals from the district court’s order granting

Plaintiff-Appellee Evelyn Davis Alfred’s motion for a preliminary injunction in

her action alleging a Fourteenth Amendment state-created danger claim under 42

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1983. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we dismiss

the appeal as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.