People v. Dene CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 2025D085212California128 words

Opinion

Buchanan, J.

DISCUSSION

Appellate counsel filed a Wende brief asking the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review and in compliance with Anders, counsel identified the following possible issues that were considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: 1) The trial court’s rejection of Dene’s Marsden motion; and 2) The trial court’s imposition of an electronic search condition as a condition of probation, over objection by the defense. We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders and have considered the possible issues identified by Dene’s counsel. We found no reasonably arguable issues supporting a reversal. Competent counsel has represented Dene in this appeal.

2 People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118. 3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

BUCHANAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

MCCONNELL, P. J.

CASTILLO, J.

4