Stanley W. Mundy v. Sacramento County Jail Medical Staff, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STANLEY W. MUNDY, No. 1:22-cv-00401-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
13 v. (ECF No. 87) 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF, et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 15 TO ADD ADDENDUM TO OPPOSITION Defendants. 16 (ECF No. 85) 17 18 Plaintiff Stanley A. Mundy is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to add addendum to opposition, filed 21 August 22, 2025 (ECF No. 85), and Plaintiff’s motion to stay the proceedings pursuant to Federal 22 Rule of Civil Procedure 56, filed September 8, 2025 (ECF No. 87).1 23 I. 24
RELEVANT BACKGROUND
25 This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s claim that Defendant Macomber, acting in his official 26 1 Although Plaintiff’s references subsection (f) of Rule 56, it appears that Plaintiff seeks relief under subsection (d) 27 which allows…